Questionnaires and Speeches

Campaign 2010 Column - Gainesville Sun

I am grateful to have served our community these five years on the Gainesville City Commission.  Now I ask to work for you on the Alachua County Commission where positive redirection is urgently needed. 

Our wonderful Alachua County is losing ground.  Consider the last eight years with the incumbent.  We have lost natural resources and beauty.  We have lost value in the homes, businesses and public investments in our cities.  We have lost contributions from our many struggling families and their children. 

There are two reasons why.  First, with the vote of the incumbent, the County Commission has permitted undue development over our agricultural and wilderness areas.  The recently expanded Oakmont Development is an example.  Our townspeople are footing the bill for what adds no value except for developers and large landowners.  The incumbent’s votes always weaken our growth management and environmental protection.

Second, the current Commission has done nothing to stem the tide of children being swept out of overwhelmed families and schools into prisons, maternity, and dependency.  The incumbent has taken no initiative to shift County priorities to strengthen struggling families so their children grow up to be productive and happy.

On the Gainesville City Commission I have worked to promote our region’s prosperity.  I’ve worked to make energy development a matter for local enterprise (with solar power, conservation, and biomass).  I’ve worked to protect our water resources and improve our transportation systems.  I’ve worked to streamline code enforcement and the permitting process for local entrepreneurship, innovation and job development.   I’ve worked to keep big box retailers from suffocating local business.  I’ve worked to protect our regional airport as an economic driver unconstrained by poorly placed development. 

I’ve stood against misguided financial decisions like the purchase of Mom’s Kitchen, the continuation of the City golf course, and the plan to build a coal-burning power plant.  I am independent of narrow interest groups.  I’ve worked to improve the quality of life for everyone through affordable housing, the senior recreation center, more community-oriented policing, a strategy to strengthen families, and parks and recreation enhancement from Possum Creek to Cone Park. 

My life’s work has centered on community development.  I’ve served in Gainesville for 24 years as church pastor and Hospice chaplain.  I’ve served as a Peace Corps teacher and organizer in the Pacific Islands, U.S. Foreign Service refugee officer in Vietnam, Community Action Agency organizer in Boston, and consultant on social programs to several federal departments. 

I currently serve on the boards of Partnership for Strong Families, Habitat for Humanity, Coalition for Older Adults, and the ACTION Network.  Previously I’ve served on the boards of Planned Parenthood, Bread of the Mighty Food Bank, and other community organizations. 

I will bring my background, values, and initiative to work for the changes we need.  I would be honored to represent you.  With one more vote we can correct the County Commission’s wayward course and build the thriving community we all want.  Thank you.

>> top

Jack's Answers to the Suwannee-St. Johns Sierra Club Questionnaire

Suwannee-St. Johns Group Sierra club Questionnaire for August 24, 2010 primary for Democratic Candidates for Alachua County Commission.

SSJ Sierra Club has about 1000 members in Alachua County who almost always vote.  We expect to endorse in the August 24 Democratic primary based on answers to this questionnaire and subsequent interviews.  Candidate’s answers will be posted on the Sierra Club website where they may be viewed by our membership and by the public.  Please indicate your degree of agreement or disagreement with each statement by inserting in the blanks either: 1-strongly agree, 2-agree, 3-neutral or no opinion, 4-disagree, 5-strongly disagree.  Also, you may include a 25-word comment on each statement in the space provided.  

  1. The County must take aggressive action to reduce energy consumption by private automobiles.  Just as the University has had dramatic success in improving transit ridership with free passes to all students, faculty and staff, the City and County should provide free bus passes to everyone, funded through a portion of the gas tax.
    1 and 3. A) Strongly agree reduce auto energy consumption B) All-free passes via gas tax – great idea – I’d push for analysis and likely favor strongly.

  2. Transit-oriented developments being promoted by developers and embraced by the County will be inadequate to relieve the traffic that the developments will create.
    1. County’s transit plan encourages sprawl and congestion.  I favor transit where we want density –well within municipal limits - not to unincorporated area park-and-rides.

  3. Because of budget constraints, the County may not enforce an Airboat Noise Ordinance even if the airboat referendum is approved by voters.
    2. I’d seek options such as: A)Strategize with Sheriff; B) Use Code Enforcement officers; C) Stake out landing sites; D) High citation fees.
  4. Alachua County should adopt measures recommended by the Energy Conservation Strategies Commission (ECSC) to meet the new State requirements for 75% recycling of solid waste by 2020.
    1. Done in San Francisco, Portland and Seattle, I believe, and Europe – so doable here.  Entrepreneur opportunities; Long run waste management savings.
  5. Alachua County should enact an ordinance to control problem waste such as single-use plastic bags, plastic water bottles, and polystyrene containers.
    1. Consider San Francisco model of fees for use, substitute containers, education   on long-term landfill savings, local economic stimulus.
  6. Alachua County should build new roads throughout the unincorporated areas in order to make these areas accessible for development.
    5. Kills investments in municipalities; destroys essential natural resources.  Right- of-way purchases for future roads also bad.  Instead revise Comprehensive Plan to increase resources protection.
  7. Local governments should not take actions or positions to promote a particular outcome on referenda coming before the voters.
    4. Trust problem here.   So let LGs publicize analyses of public policy questions – let elected officials state their views -- disallow LG institutional encouragement of particular outcomes.
  8. In order to limit urban sprawl, Alachua County should amend its comprehensive plan to prohibit extension of sewer and water lines outside the urban services boundary.
    1. Protective MOUs could be altered by pro-sprawl commissions (eg, Newberry Rd).  Municipalities can, I believe, use CRAs to develop water treatment facilities.
  9. Wherever sewer lines exist throughout Gainesville and Alachua County, businesses and residents should be required to connect at their own expense.
    2 and 4. Municipalities: Use CRA/TIF for sewers to encourage infill/density; subsidize to eliminate septic tanks.   Unincorporated: New development, yes; Old development, provide subsidy incentives and perhaps require as condition for sale.
  10. The County should seek a continuation of the half-cent sales tax for purchasing land for conservation and to improve recreation.
    1. Yes, better for natural resources, natural beauty, public health, local agriculture, and rural living.

>> top

Police Benevolent Association of Florida County Commission Questionnaire

What do you view as the most important issue facing the county?
What are the goals and/or what would you like to accomplish as a county commissioner?
Do you believe the county commission has public safety in its top priorities? Explain.
Do you support your local deputies’ right to enter into a collective bargaining agreement with the sheriff? Explain.
Where do you believe the Deputy Sheriffs’ pay should rank compared to other agencies in the surrounding areas and what would you do to ensure that the county staff carried out your policy concerning deputy sheriff pay?
How would you, as a county commissioner, ensure that the sheriff carried out your policy concerning deputy sheriff pay?
What is your position on unification of law enforcement services in Alachua County?
If the Association decides to endorse you, do we have your permission to advertise the endorsement?

>> top

Commissioner Donovan's Statement At July 15, 2010 City Commission Meeting about Fire Assessment Fee

Our context tonight for deciding on a fire assessment fee is that these are difficult financial times for some of our citizens and for the provision of City services.  From  2005 to now, our City’s General Government budget has increased from about $84 million to about $100 million.  During the same period, Gainesville’s population has increased from about 95,000 to about 130,000 people.  So the growth in budget has fallen somewhat behind the growth in population (16% versus 37%, calculating roughly). 

During that time, while the appraised value of taxable property has increased greatly (until this Republican recession), the City Commission has lowered the millage (property tax) rate each year to reduce impact on citizens.  Gainesville’s tax and fee charges remain in the bottom 25% of our peer Florida municipalities, while the State of Florida’s taxes per capita remain near the bottom among U.S. states.  If you can find a less expensive, high quality of life community in the country, good luck.

I myself am proud to be a public servant on the Gainesville City Commission.  Despite some harsh comments from a few citizens tonight, I know this commission to be a responsible, honest and democratic public body.  I believe current and past events have shown that representative democracy such as ours to be responsible about people’s pocket books, while the same cannot be said for too many other entities including many American financial and corporate giants.

From our studies, I am convinced that a fire assessment is a good practice and that we have identified a good methodology which assigns costs fairly – more so, it seems to me, than the property tax that has been distorted by the misleading Save Our Homes policies.

I apologize if my fellow commission members and citizens wanted an approach different from going through the decrement list tonight.  My view was that this was what would be wise to do so that every citizen would hear and consider the argument for or against each program and position.  So, differences in approach. 

But I believe we have heard from people of many ideologies and circumstances that times are tough.  So  I am willing to make more cuts in the fire assessment rate – maybe to 15%, yielding I’d guess about $1.7 million.  This low assessment rate would, I think, put helpful pressure on citizens and commissioners alike to decide which programs and positions are worthy of funding and then consider whether a millage increase is warranted.

In that process, I will take the same cost/benefit approach that led me on the one hand to oppose funding the City golf course, the purchase of Mom’s Kitchen, and the construction of a coal power plant -- and that led me on the other hand to support energy conservation practices and investment in business development and neighborhood and environmental protection.  I will study the numbers and compare the values of the competing needs. 

I will say, in closing, that I do not hold with the position frequently articulated tonight, that fire and police services, valuable though they are, should be held sacrosanct above and beyond other City services.   Years of research make it clear that both the safety and happiness of a community are increased most when that community invests in the dignity and productivity of every citizen, especially in struggling families, rather than wait and try belatedly to defend against wayward spirits .   That dynamic will be very important in shaping my priorities for both budget cuts and expenditures.  Thank you.

>> top

Primary Navigation